MG
The Classic Marque

I could Guy.

But I could also be prosecuted.

Optional?

If you don't like it, just don't pay a licence fee. It's one of the few taxes that is both hypothecated and optional.

Of course it's a joke Guy. Lol. The same old joke over and over again. 'The dark far right forces' out to destroy bbc. Lol.

As for chucking out the baby. It should be. It's long past being independent and innovative. It's stale, tired, and woke.

I hope it's cancelled. Privatise it. If it's still any good, it'll survive and thrive. If not, it'll die off.

My reference to a Conspiracy Theory, was exactly that! A joke Anamn. I assumed you would realise 🤔

Clearly the 'fake news' and lying in the Panorama documentary should not have been done. It's surprising that the production team haven't stepped forward as they are obviously at fault. No excuses there. But to use this to attempt to bring down the BBC is just ludicrous. The target should...

Here's a bit of good news. 😄.

At least I get 200 quid off the extra tax bill coming from Rachel Thieves Budget. 🙄

I completely agree with you both, Jan and Dave.

Guy said, "How's that for a conspiracy. (theory?)"

🤣🤣🤣. A very poor attempt to deflect and minimise. 2/10. Lol.

Why has it taken so long to come out?

Firstly it was shown ONE year ago, not two. And why did it take so long for the Post Office scandal to come out? Or the ongoing scandal of the Pakistani musl...

It doesn’t matter how long the documentary was, or how long the clip was. The important thing is what they were trying to do by editing the clip.

Saying that Trump is a liar is merely deflecting from the serious consequences of what they were trying to portray.

It appears people are trying to trivialise what the BBC have done. It doesn't matter what Trump has said or done in the past the BBC has deliberately broadcast false information on a very important issue. They are guilty of interfering in the electoral process of a foreign country, just as the Rusians did with us. Anyone who supports a responsible and impartial BBC, as I do, shouild be furious wit...

Yes, as I said. They altered a section. Tampered with it. Falsified its meaning. Naughty! For all of 11 seconds out of the hour long programme.

Isn't it a coincidence that this has come to light just now and not been noticed nearly two years ago, when first shown. Ah, of course, the BBC is due an imminent review, the right wing press want it out of public ownership so they can better in...

Overstepped? 🤣🤣🤣.

Except they DIDN'T just edit it. Guy. They ALTERED it, thereby fabricating the story they wanted to tell.

Why? TDS. That's why. I think you may have a touch of it too Guy. 😉😉.

All the lefties just can't admit that it was a deliberate act, to falsify what Trump said. They still claim it was a 'mistake'.

Two resignations, plus anot...